'Jason Davies of Petaluma, the vice president of a software company, said, "Our company has become less profitable over the last several years because of the increasing costs of our health care premiums."
Many others tried to score points for health care reform based on caring for others, and moral duty. I'm sorry, they're absolutely right in their convictions, but wrong in their approach.
I would like to encourage us to stop trying to convince the right based on morality - that particular argument works for us, but not for them. Instead, we need to make the point, as Mr. Davies did, that our small businesses are suffering under the current system of for-profit insurance companies - which in every other country in the developed world would be non-profit and strictly regulated. And most importantly, we need to make the point that we pay the highest price for health care out of all industrialized nations, and we have the worst results in the developed world, from infant mortality to longevity.
We need to make that point over and over again. Because the other side has proved that arguments about "the moral good" don't matter to them. How do we know that? Because some opponents of health care reform were actually booing constituents who had serious illnesses.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment – I guess I'm somewhat flattered. I wasn't really prepared to speak but I just had to say something and I'm just glad it seemed to resonate. Just a correction, I'm not the owner (though the owners do share my views on this), but yes, I do agree that it seems everything needs to be addressed in dollars and cents for many on the right. I've always felt generally that ensuring a highly educated and healthy public is the best way to ensure economic growth. People can't buy our products if they aren't healthy – and when they can't pay their medical bills, we end up paying it anyway. For me, it finally comes down to how we can ensure a brighter future – our country's greatest resource are it's citizens. Our future depends on them being healthy, regardless of party affiliation. Most of the opponents aren't really debating healthcare – they really just seem to want to replay the last election. I do believe it's our time to take our country back. Debate is healthy and so is minority opposition. But that doesn't mean we should ignore the views of a large majority who elected Obama and Democratic members of Congress when it was very well established that they would move forward on healthcare reform and a public option.
That's what really tipped it for me. When I heard one woman say this was suddenly being pushed on them, I had to remind everyone that this shouldn't be a surprise and that the outcome of the last election clearly indicates that most Americans are in favor of a public option (if not single payer) and that we don't have to keep debating talking points from the 2008 election cycle. The guy who said I was a plant was wrong of course...I'm not that good an actor... : )
Best regards,
Jason
Jason,
ReplyDeleteThanks for writing in. And thank you for standing up at Lynn Woolsey's meeting. It's greatly appreciated.
I'm wondering if your company is interested in getting involved with the Main Street Business Alliance, a group of small business owners who support a robust public option. It appears they've already won over one Blue Dog Democrat. To me, that's really impressive.
This article from the NY Times should tell you more about them:
http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/small-business-group-forges-an-alliance-for-health-care-reform/?hp
Here's their website:
http://mainstreetalliance.org/wordpress/
They don't yet have a presence in California. But they need one. Or maybe there is already a similar group in California that they could network with.
Thanks again for standing up.